Watch Ary News

Watch BBC World & Al-Jazeera

Watch Dawn News TV

Watch Dunya TV

Watch Express TV

Home » Articles and Features, Featured

Mehsud dead: When asset becomes liability

Submitted by on August 7, 2009 – 11:17 pm57 Comments
Mehsud dead: When asset becomes liability

The Pakistani media and the Foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, were not long to announce the death of the leader of the Taliban forces in Pakistan, Behtullah Mehsud. In contrast to the Pakistani media and government, the White House has been cautious enough to not have confirmed the claims of his death yet.

Despite the crimes he committed, he was at the end of the day a Pakistani citizen who was killed by an alien drone attack under a period of foreign domination.

The truth behind the death of Mehsud is a different topic all together.

What concerns us is why he was put to death by the hands of ‘foreigners’ to whom we have given no right to decide our policies for us. (Apparently)

However, his death is a major climax for the whole country and does raise several questions in the minds of the citizens.

The first and foremost question that arouses in our minds is why the local government has not wholly confirmed the death of Mehsud.

The human mind has been designed in a way that forces it to think and probe about possibilities and therefore when one thinks of a question, he thinks about the answers to it as well.

The fact that’ the Pakistani government is not confirming his death can mean two things. Firstly, that the local government is only just a stage show being acted out by professional actors who are prompted and paid to do what they do.

Secondly, the Pakistani intelligence agencies are not credible, competent or independent enough to confirm the reports.

Surprisingly the USA government did not substantiate Mehsud’s death either, which begs the question that on what information did they launch the attack? The US authorities must verify this news because they are the ones who know how credible their information sources are and obviously they did not attack to just kill his wife. If the US is unable to confirm or refute Mehsud’s killing, then they must redefine their intelligence network that is barely credible and responsible for killing of hundreds of innocents inside Pakistan’s tribal areas. The ruthless US drones kill people without discrimination. After all the victims are Pakistanis and Muslims at that.

The key vital question that is stirring up is why was Mehsud killed by a USA drone? Did he become a liability instead of asset? There have been credible news reports in the past as well as actions and words of Mehsud himself that suggested that he was anything but a patriot, he was a traitor who was fighting against Pakistan’s interest in the name of Islam. Mehsud indeed was a terrorist, but question is whose terrorist? Who were his handlers? Mehsud’s own close aides have claimed that he was driven by RAW and CIA, notorious intelligence agencies of India and the USA.

Haji Turkistan Betani, a former close aide of Baitullah Mahsud, has claimed that assassination of Benazir Bhutto was plotted by Baitullah Mehsud.

This comes after Qari Zainuddin, a rival commander of Tehrik-e-Taliban Chief Baitullah Mehsud, on Wednesday disclosed that the TTP has links with India and Israel.

On the other hand, a Taliban commander from Orakzai Hafiz Saeed rejected the claims of Qari Zainuddin. He told Geo News that Zain was playing into the hands of the government to defame the TTP. He said the Qari is neither the successor of Baitullah nor has any affiliation with the TTP.

According to another report, the ISI and Pakistan government had been seeking America’s assistance to kill Mehsud for years and even provided them with credible intelligence about Mehsud’s hideouts but in vain. What does this suggest? We leave this question to our readers to answer. It is though evident that the USA until recently avoided targeting Mehsud. The question remains why now? Is it because the UN commission is looking into Benazir’s assassination and its possible aspects or is it because they did not want Pakistan Military to capture them to reveal things that were not meant to be told?

Either way you look, it appears that Mehsud’s death comes at a time when he could cause them trouble if captured alive. For Pakistanis one more enemy of the state has been eliminated and that is something to rejoice. TTP is clearly baffled and divided as they have failed to nominate Mehsud’s successor. Couple with open disagreement between TTP and the Taliban leadership one can only hope that the the traitors and agents working for foreign interests are eliminated, the sooner the better.

57 Comments »

  • Observer says:

    it is a mess and the above article proves that there is a lot guessing on many issues related to the war. How do we get out of this mess with regard to the current scenario?

    - Tell the Yankees that from now on the Pakistani national interests will be supreme!
    - Stop the supply lines to the foreign invaders.
    - Send back all surplus military/agnecy/civil persons related to the US embassy. The longer they stay the more mess they will create.
    - Lay down own strategy to move forward in the troubled areas.

    I know I am day dreaming…who will tell the Americans? The Zardari clan, the Butt clan or our generals?

  • afzaalkhan says:

    CNN already started see drone attacks good, why pakistani against it let the games begins

  • afzaalkhan says:

    and there we go

    Baitullah Mehsud is alive, claims Hakeemullah Mehsud

    PESHAWAR: The spokesman of Tahreek-e-Taliban and close relative of Baitullah Mehsud has denied the reports of killing of Baitullah Mehsud and claimed that he is alive.

    Talking to an Arabic Television, Hakeemullah said Baitullah is alive and remained leading Tahreek, a videotape will be release soon as a proof of statement.

    Hakeemullah said Baitullah gone into hiding as a part of strategy and he is not in contact with anyone after drone attack.

    Replying to question about his presence in father-in-law house, Hakeemullah said living in in-laws house is against Peshtoon tradition and Baitullah was not present in his father-in-law house at the time of drone attack. He said meetings of Majlis Shura of Tahreek-e-Taliban are part of routine.

  • shimatoree says:

    In an organisation such as the Taliban movement- contrary to the wishes of the outsiders- the DEATH of one person means nothing other than to inflame emotions further. This attitude is based on the fundamental fact of knowing that the outsiders do not know nor do they comprehend the reasons as to why there is the Taliban.
    For example-

    1. To say that Mehsud is a creation of the Indians and the Americans and Israelis etc is to try to belittle him and the Talibs. Oh is only he did not have the support he would not be much .
    On the other hand if you accept that this a reaction to the invasion by the outsiders- then you have to think about doing something about that cause-( which you can’t).

    2. If we accept that Baitullah Mehsud is a foreign agent of India etc- then if we apply the same yardstick-
    so is Shah Mehmood Qureshi , Zardari, NS, Kiyani etc. They are fighting a war against their own people at the instigation of the West and they are doing it for big money too.

    The hurry with which everyone has spoken about his death is amazing to say the least. My reading is that Zardari has sold more of the country and get ready for some form of an American invasion with the collusion of the current set up of PPP and PML-N.

    3. If he is not dead- well then get ready for more problems.

    4. AND it is true that going and STAYING overnight at your in-law’s house is considered very bad amongst not only the Pushtoons but also most of the Punjabis esp of the Seraiki and Mianwali areas.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shimatoree

    In an organisation such as the Taliban movement- contrary to the wishes of the outsiders- the DEATH of one person means nothing other than to inflame emotions further.

    so be it, I backed Mullah Sufi mohd sharai agenda and was against swat operation, If TTP insist on the way of gun then we not running away, If this inflame the tribes so be it, either they stop doing their crap in Pakistan or they will be destroyed.

    As it is my objection is that why drones was used, it should be us doing the killing. Cuz USA will use this to boast support for drone attack and simultaneously make it look like Pak forces are incomppetent.

  • shimatoree says:

    Afzaalkhan

    I do not know where the word KHAN comes from in your name but if I am to assume that your ancestors came from the Pushto speaking areas ad that is the reason for KHAN- Then you ought to know-
    that THEY will not and cannot be destroyed . You along with Alexander, Darius, Russians, etc etc have had the same dream and history has taught the lesson that Pushtoons cannot and will not be destroyed . THEY will STOP ” doing their CRAP” when you stop being the agents for AMERICA and the WEST.

    Oh the comment- “it should be us doing the killing”

    I don’t think you want to be doing that until and unless you want to have a vendetta going for the next 300 years.

    Thank the Americans- they are taking the blame for your dirty work which you say you want to do.

  • taukeer says:

    A lot of confusion on the issue including denial of Mehsud’s death and clash among TTP groups etc. I am sure the situation will take a few days to clear up.

  • taukeer says:

    Munawar Hussain JI chief issues a statement condemning drone attacks.

    • afzaalkhan says:

      waiting for liberal american tattos and our govts retards starting to blast JI for supporting taliban. JI and IK has a serious problem they dun understand they are addressing jahil leaders and qaum. lol

      8-8-2009_1856_1.gif

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shimatoree

    plz lets not start with pushtoon and other ethnic groups. I never said nething abt pushtoons. I talked abt TTP and Mehsud and like it or not watever was thier original agenda they were not doing any thing good for pakistan. So if he is dead good riddance.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    Let the gamessssssssssssss begin – ROFL

    8-8-2009_1839_1.gif

  • afzaalkhan says:

    The Christian Science Monitor points out that the death of Mehsud followed internal strife within the Pakistani Taliban itself, making me wonder whether some insiders angry at Mehsud tipped off ISI about the leader’s whereabouts:

    Killing of Pakistan Taliban chief could touch off power struggle

    The probable killing of a top Taliban leader in Pakistan may open up a power struggle within the fractious insurgency that Islamabad could use to divide and conquer.

    Baitullah Mehsud unified more than a dozen militant factions two years ago, putting them under his umbrella as the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). But as recently as late June, Mr. Mehsud faced a serious revolt within his own Mehsud tribe – one he put down by assassinating its leader.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    qts is what zardari and co has agreed to pay usa to get mehsud killeed, I mean they r the most benificiary as even though a terrorist mehsud had personal problem with them, so wat zardari and co has promise to do for usa that they targetted mehsud.

    Wonder if nota can shed some light :)

  • afzaalkhan says:

    Man abdul qaidir hassan nailed, mullah diesel calleed mehsud shahed time to sent mullah diesel to earn some shahadah .

    1100688975-2.gif

  • taukeer says:

    I predicted Mehsud’d death sometime ago. Reason! he had been disowned by Taliban after he continued to pursue his own agenda. His position was leaked to ISI by those very close to him. The Taliban want to concentrate on the Afghanistan front where they continue to make good progress. They were very concerned about the erosion of public sympathy in Pakistan caused by the actions of Mehsud. Their other concern was the relationship Mehsud had forged with RAW / Mossad and CIA.

    The fire fight at the so called meeting of a faction of “TTP” also demonstrates that this was an outcast break away group of Taliban which does not enjoy the support of Mullah Umar otherwise the local Amir has to be appointed by Mullah Umar.

    I am sure there will be some realignment going on in the next few days and that will determine whether RAW / Mossad manage to hold together this faction or will it splinter.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    Is Baitullah really dead?

    Hamid Mir

    US drone attacks are not popular in Pakistan but it is the first time that a big number of Pakistanis are happy over a news report that the head of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, Baitullah Mehsud, was killed in a drone attack on Aug 5 in South Waziristan. Baitullah Mehsud was the most wanted and the most ruthless man in Pakistan who was responsible for dozens of suicide attacks across the country. Government of Pakistan has not officially confirmed his death yet. (The Taliban have denied his killing.)

    News of his death first came through American media sources on Aug 7. Pakistani Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi also confirmed his death by quoting intelligence sources but Interior Minister Rehman Malik is careful. A senator from South Wazirastan told him in the morning of Aug 8 that Baitullah is not dead and that was why Rehman Malik never confirmed the death of the most wanted man to media. Many Pakistanis think that if Baitullah is dead just few days before the 62nd independence day of Pakistan then it is a great gift from a US drone but common Pakistanis are also raising some questions.

    Pakistani security establishment started saying last year that Baitullah was actually working for Americans and Indians and that was why US drones never attacked him. The reason behind this conspiracy theory was the rising suicide attacks against Pakistani security forces. ISI requested CIA many times in 2007 to target Baitullah Mehsud but CIA never obliged ISI. CIA was under the impression that ISI is not helping it in hunting down the militant leaders like Maulvi Nazir, Hafiz Gul Bahadar and Sirajuddin Haqqani who are attacking US troops in Afghanistan. Pakistani government made peace agreements with these militants who were only fighting in Afghanistan while Baitullah was fighting against Pakistani security forces. Situation started changing after the removal of Musharraf from the top Army command.

    Well coordinated joint efforts to defeat Taliban and Al Qaeda were started just few months back. US announced 5 million dollars and Pakistan announced 50 million rupees as a head money for Baitullah. Some problems were still there. Few weeks ago a rebel militant from South Wazirastan Qari Zainuddin Mehsud gave interviews to Pakistani media and claimed that Baitullah was working for Americans and Indians. This rebel militant was backed by the security establishment and his claim created lot of misunderstandings. Within few days of these interviews, Baitullah killed Qari Zinuddin on June 23, 2009, in Dera Ismail Khan and gave a message that he can target his enemies anytime and anywhere in Pakistan.

    Just few weeks after the death of Qari Zainuddin, Pakistani intelligence sources are now claiming that Baitullah have been killed in a US drone attack. Question is that will the Pakistani government pay Rs50 Million to CIA for eliminating the most wanted man in the country? US drones cannot target anyone in Pakistani territory until someone from Pakistan is not ready to share intelligence with CIA. Now who will get 5 million US dollars from CIA in Pakistan? Will our president and prime minister say openly “Thank You America?” or they will again condemn the US drone attack in Pakistan? It is now proved that despite some trust deficit in the past, currently US and Pakistani intelligence agencies are working closely with each other. Pakistani security forces encircled Baitullah Mehsud from three sides in South Wazirastan and someone provided information of his movement to CIA and that was how the head of Pakistani Taliban was targeted by a US drone. There is no doubt now. US drones are attacking targets in Pakistan with the secret cooperation from some Pakistanis but our government always condemned these drone attacks. Pakistan today needs a transparent and bold policy for fighting terrorism. If we are coordinating US drone attacks in our own country then our government should not condemn drone attacks in Pakistan publicly. It is only creating misunderstandings. Common Pakistanis cannot be fooled. It is the Pakistani government which is losing credibility. A government without credibility cannot defeat terrorism. If Baitullah is really dead and our government is happy then US drone attacks in Pakistan will be legitimised and we will not be in a position to condemn these attacks in the future. May be that is the reason Interior Minister Rehman Malik told me that “even if Baitullah Mehsud is killed i condemn US drone attacks in Pakistan.”

    We must learn lessons from our past mistakes. We must admit that Baitullah Mehsud was actually created by our own establishment. We used Brig (R) Qayyum Sher in January 2005 to win the support of Baitullah Mehsud against Abdullah Mehsud. Lt Gen Safdar Hussain approved the first peace agreement with Baitullah Mehsud in February 2005 and Pakistan Army agreed to withdraw its troops from the areas under Baitullah control. After the withdrawal of the Army from his areas, Baitullah broke the peace agreement in July 2005. He kidnapped 243 Pakistani soldiers from his area in August 2007 and Musharraf was forced to release these soldiers again through another secret deal with Baitullah on Nov 4, 2007. Pakistani establishment again struck a deal with him in January 2008 but it was broken in a few weeks. All these deals were secret. We don’t need secret deals with militants anymore. If we need peace deals then discuss these deals first in the parliament.

    And the most important lesson. We should not form any private militias against other private militias to fight in our own country. Read Article 256 of the Constitution of Pakistan which says “no private organisation capable of functioning as a military organization shall be formed, and any such organisation shall be illegal.” Unfortunately we are again forming private militias in Swat, Buner and Dir. These militias may produce some more Baitullah Mehsuds.

    I still believe that we must not celebrate the reported death of Baitullah Mehsud. His network is still intact. If he is dead then his network will organise brutal attacks in our cities soon. His physical elimination is not a victory. I think that the real victory will be establishing the writ of Pakistani state in the whole of South Wazirastan. Unfortunately we don’t have control in that area. We are not sure that Baitullah is dead or alive. For me he is still alive. I will consider him dead when the national flag of Pakistan will be hoisted on the buildings of all the schools in South Wazirastan and students will celebrate Aug 14 without any fear.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @nota

    I tot my next sentence will actually clear it up. If someone needs to be punished inside Pakistan that should be done by state of Pakistan, irragardless of his/her crimes we can’t allow foriegners to come and kill people who are pakistani citizen inside paksitan. I highly doubt Mehsud wouild have surrendereed any attempt would have result in fire fight.If state has decided they can’t apprehend him and only way was to kill him extrajudicially then its should still be done by state of Pakistan, so if there is dispute we can always go to court or atleast state is bound to answer to its citizen why it was neccessary. Hope this clear up.

    This drone attack that killed Mehsud will bump the 10% support that Pakistani have for drone attacks to atleast few points. This give incredible tool to Americans to argue see drone attacks works, we took out someone whom u couldn’t, also raising at same time the failure of security and intelligence agenciees of Pakistan. Just to name some benefits. Ultimately we ends with lot of negatives.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @nota

    I really dun understand wat ur objection is? When did i say usa is a freind? But am I sad Mehsud is dead u can safely bet I am not, that said I object to the drone attack and like i stated though mehsud dead is good news the negatives are too much, what will be price usa exact for this favor, somehow I have a feeling we will be paying a bigger price. I hope I have made myslef clear,

    U know man I udnerstand there is loadshedding in Pak and situation is not very peaceful and I understand the fruusturation level, a britherly advise, takee a deep breath before replying.

  • shimatoree says:

    Afzaal

    Rehman Malik and the Zardari administration are a bunch of thieves and liars and have no credibility. YOU agree with that statement I am sure.

    As yet when they say anything about the TTP or Mehsud or any such characters- THEY are the State of Pakistan and they should be believed.

    Let me get this straight. You accept the statements and characterizations of confirmed criminals, crooks and Liars when made against violent terror promoters etc ! Am I misunderstanding something here.
    To me- what Zardari , Rehman Malik say means nothing and it has never meant nothing. I try find my facts somewhere else if I can.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shimatoree

    what statement from zardari and co I have accepted? If ur referring to Mehsud being a taritor I only go by his words and deeds. I dun care how noble hiss cause was wat he did and said was more then enuff 4 me..

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @nota

    Objection?
    Mehsud is a nobody. A “villian” that I call “Emmanuel Goldstein” of “your” war of terror. I think you are giving the “individual” too much credit and assuming things are just that plain and simple…. ;-) .

    Mehsud wasn’;t nobody, like it or not he was the leader of so called TTP. His death is news worthy event. I think u didnt read the artcile by admin. I agree with the points raised there. Anyway one less irritant to take care of. As for ur sarcastic remark about YOUR War on terror, I think u really loosing it, I am staunch opponent of this so called war of terror. U can read my comments Click Here

    It appears u have gotten same virus, anyone who dun agreee with everything u say 110% must be ridiculed and bashed, a disease I tot only baboons were affliateed with, but it seems its conatguious. How abt lets debate the isssue, I am still scratching my head trying to understadn what u saying. So lets put it thsi way,.

    Mehsud death is good or bad news?
    How does it efffect pakistan?

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @nota

    I agree 100% with u on Mehsud killed by drone attack is bad and the negatives for pak r tioo much,

    That said strictly talking abt Mehssud being dead or alive, I would rather see him dead.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @nota

    There is a huge difference btween naik mohammad shaheed and Mehsud.

    Also plz beware ur contradicting our holiest angelic Mr. Pak khapey he has assured us india is not thread. Tooba Tooba kufr :P lol

  • afzaalkhan says:

    Way u guys think of This?

    After Mehsud – The rest of the Pakistani Taliban won’t be such easy targets.

    So, does Mehsud’s death mean the end of the Pakistani Taliban? Not by a long shot. The Taliban are a regenerative militia; historically, the death of one Taliban member has only spurred others to avenge the fallen one’s death. Several commanders are waiting to take over from Mehsud, including Qari Hussein, Mehsud’s ruthless deputy, who is thought to be most responsible for training suicide bombers. Whether Hussein or another lieutenant takes over, they’ll be hoping to strike back.

    Still, in the often shaky counterterrorism alliance between the United States and Pakistan, Mehsud was an easy target. Picture two circles, with America’s greatest enemies in one and Pakistan’s top foes in another: Baitullah Mehsud landed squarely in the overlap. The Pakistanis were willing to supply the intelligence, and the United States was willing the fly the drones to get him.

    Now the hard part begins. Since the CIA has demonstrated its ability to pinpoint “high-level targets,” it will want to go after other top Taliban leaders in Pakistan, such as Maulvi Nazir in South Waziristan and Jalaluddin Haqqani in North Waziristan. But Pakistan’s military and security establishment perceives both men, who focus their fighting in Afghanistan and not in Pakistan, as national security assets more than threats. And there’s no magic drone strike to fix that.

  • shimatoree says:

    @Afzaal-

    You have accepted the statements of Rehman Malik about Baitullah Mehsud’ proposed death.
    You have supported the so called war on terror.

    That is enough for me. To me these crooks have no credibility what so ever. I do not read except in this blog what they say. I do not hear what they say.
    Now you might say that the present Govt. has been elected by the people of Pakistan on 18th of Feb 2008 in a general election.

    And YOU believe that !.
    And therefore they are legitimate.

    You take a group of people who would not have been able to stand for election anywhere because of their crimes against the country.
    Then American Govt buys the murderer Musharraf-( their agent) with the promise of saving his dictatorship – and his rubber stamp parliament passes an ordinance washing them clean of all their crimes including murder.

    Wallah ! Now they are clean. So these people run for election and are able to fool the people of Pakistan into putting them incharge.

    And you think that is representative Govt.
    It is as though all the people of Pakistan were thieves and crooks and murderers and THEY elected crooks and thieves as their leaders !

    Well , they might be YOUR leaders but we have different point of view about your fair elections of Feb 18th 2008.

  • shimatoree says:

    @ nota – need direct contact.

    shimatoree@yahoo.com

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shimatoree

    Ur accusing me of things I have not said. Plz read my above comments and show me where I have

    1 – Supported War On terror? Like I said to nota U can read my comments here to know my stand on war on terror.

    2 – Regarding Mehsud death, all I have accepted is news reports, which incidently Hamid Mir very clearly pointed out yesterday in his column in jang, there is no independent media confirmation. As I said above to nota, I would rather see Mehsud dead or atleast tried for his crimes. This in no way make me believe wat govt is saying, I dun trust any govt saying anything without having something that either proves it or atleast show some common sense.

  • taukeer says:

    Having a cat fight boys!!! LOL
    Rehman Malik Qadiyani (alleged) and Moron in Chief beating their chest about their achievement.

    Did any one hear Rehman Malik Kochwan beggibg for drones from the Americans? He sounded like a typical police wala talking to his superior officer. Now I understand what our “mutafiqa” Prime minister had in mind when he wanted RM to oversee all intelligence agencies.

    God how long will we have to endure these morons? I am a bit bored with them!!!

  • taukeer says:

    I think it is time to take the gloves off for our “Mutafiqa” Prime minister the two timing SOB who cant walk straight without guidance. Sometimes I wonder how did we manage to gather such a unique collection of “Leaders”. The B@@@@dy morons could not be trusted to run a corner shop talk less of running the 7th Nuclear power of the world with fifth largest army.

  • shimatoree says:

    To anyone who is listening-

    We have an illigitimate and illegal usurper group of thieves and crooks which is occupying our country . And they have rented the army to the Americans to control their people.

    If I told you that the Martians had come to Pakistan and caused some politicians to mutate and become their mutant human beings- YOU would say that it was science fiction.
    But that is exactly what has occurred in Pakistan- the only difference is that instead of the Martians the Americans are here having created their mutant “pseudo-American agents” to rule and control Pakistan.

    Q- The present Govt. has been elected by the people of Pakistan on 18th of Feb 2008 in a general election.

    And YOU believe all of that I am sure !.
    You take a group of people who would not have been able to stand for election anywhere because of their crimes against their own country.
    Then American Govt buys the murderer Musharraf-( their agent) with the promise of saving his dictatorship – and his rubber stamp parliament / cabinet agree to pass an ordinance washing them clean of all their crimes including murder.

    Wallah ! Now they are clean. So these people run for election and are able to fool the people of Pakistan into putting them incharge.

    And you think that is representative Govt.
    It is as though all the people of Pakistan were thieves and crooks and murderers and THEY elected crooks and thieves as their leaders !

    Well , they might be YOUR leaders but we have different point of view about your fair elections of Feb 18th 2008.

  • shimatoree says:

    Taukeer

    Baitullah Mehsud might be this or that but he has not been tried in aa court of law and convicted of the crimes he is accused of. Therefore he is innocent till proven guilty.

    Now who is saying he is guilty of this or that. Guess who. The present lot of Rehman Malik, Zardari, Shah Mehmood Qureshi and so on.

    Well since all these guys cannot be believed as they are confirmed liars- so my question is how can someone come to the conclusion that Baitullah Mehsud is re incarnation of EVIL. I am not a Mehsud nor do I know anything about the guy but the above logic is simple and to the point.

    It seems to be that there are people who claim to be against Zardari and his gang but they believe and re- vomit what those very same guys say. As regards the news media- they are singing the same tune as the Zardari gang since it is they who are supplying them with the news.

    The discussion on all the TV talk shows were about the death of Baitullah Mehsud.
    A person-( Afzaal) said that he was happy that Baitullah was dead. Why ? Some personal vendetta ! But I thought the originator of the Punjabi named Sohni Dhurti was not a JUNGLI Pathan who suffer from the revenge disease .

    As unpalatable as it might be- innocent till proven guilty. Due process of law is for everyone including Baitullah Mehsud.
    And that means that NO ONE has the right to kill him.
    If anyone disagrees- then they support what the Americans have done in Guantanamo Bay and what Zardari and his gang support. And the case is proven beyond any reasonable doubt for thinking reasonable people.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shimatoree

    A person-( Afzaal) said that he was happy that Baitullah was dead. Why ? Some personal vendetta ! But I thought the originator of the Punjabi named Sohni Dhurti was not a JUNGLI Pathan who suffer from the revenge disease.

    U continue with ur bizzare ranting without even asnwering my qts, putting words in my mouth and twisting wat I said to outright lies. But this ethnic mixing is a real low. You dun even know whats my ethnic background and u assume about site name. Soo there is no purpose in discussing with you anything. All I have to say is

    Javab Jahilaan Bashad Khamoshi.

  • shimatoree says:

    Afzaal

    You may label me as a Jahil but I shall not reply to that.

    I would suggest a bit of cool headed reflection before making hasty statements.

    If the signal you are sending is STOP- I can very easily do that.

    But I will comment on the issue of ethnicity.

    It was not me who chose the name SOHNIDHURTI.

    • afzaalkhan says:

      and I can assure you no ethnicity was involved in the choosing of name, it was from the song

      sohnidhurti ALLAH rakhey and was the 10th choice as 1st nine were already taken. That said even if I accept ur claim that its derived from punjabi so what? Wat this has to do with discussion we are having?

      • pak.nukes says:

        What the hell is going on here? How does ‘Sohni dhurti” represent Punjab or punjabi? and why did we even start this ethinicity topic here? Are we not all untied for Pakistan? Don’t we want Pakistan to prosper and we be called only and only PAKISTANIS? I can’t believe it is happening here…@Taukeer@observer@nota where are you guys? this is not what we wanted from this forum, we are not promoting racial bias we are promoting nationalism as pakistanis. This is disgusting.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    A very good article.

    col2.gif

  • shimatoree says:

    Afzaal

    Yes I am a bit sensitive about the Pushtoons- my people. You may name the web site what you want but you also must accept that the word sohni and dhurti is Punjabi and Hindi.
    Why do I have a problem with this name ?

    You might ask then like Shakespeare ” What is in a name !

    The name should represent something to all- not just to some. I did not know the meaning of this name. Yes – it probably seems insignificant to many but to-day a lot of the problems the country faces are those of perception.
    As a Pushtoon- to me sohnidhurti at first glance means something from East Punjab where the Sikhs live.
    My point is and has been that Baitullah Mehsud is innocent untill proven guilty in a court of law.

    No and I mean no one has the right to kill him.

    No one should be happy or gloat on his death or should approve of it.

    @ Paknukes-

    If this is a blog for discussion and rebuttal – then all topics are KOSHER. Make your point- do not ask NOTA, TAUKEER or Observer to intervene. Afzaal is fully capable to handle whatever I may have to dish out.
    The name of a website is important otherwise people would not be paying lots of money for the names that they want . So what is the problem ?

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @shiamotoree

    I am urdu speaking whose parents and uncles aunts migrated from Delhi, India and am sorry for me sohnidhurti represents Pakistan with all its ethnicities and languages. But I am not Pakistani 1st am Muslim so for me there are no boundries and ethnicities or nation are nothing, one can be sindhi, baluchi pathan etc for themselves for me there is only one nation i.e Muslim. When I opened this site its for all pakistanis with all color and political stripes. As I have made it clear in Site statement which you can read on the page title “ABOUT”.

    That said the only consideration we took when we opened the site was a name that would be Pakistani and reflect pakistani view hence after checking different names we came up with sohnidhurti whcih was available for registration. The national language of Pakistan is Urdu and the site name reflect that.

    As of Mehsud death, baba fareed I think said,

    Dushman mareen te khushi na kareen — kal sajna vi mar jana eh

    But one should remember Sayadana Eisa PBUH command
    “one who live by sword shall die by sword”.

    Mehsud choose this way and he met the death accordingly, as the original article mentoned and the one I posted by Irfan Siddique I denounce drone attacks and Mehsud dun matter wat his crimes shouldn’t have been killed this way. That said once again I am not sad he is dead, it has nothing to do with Muhsud being pushtoon I would glad to see Altaf Hussain dead and MQM wiped out, ethnicity has no bearing for me.

  • shimatoree says:

    Afzaal

    Thank you .
    I do appreciate and understand what you wrote and would agree with 100 % with what you said about being a Muslim first and anything else second . It would be a good idea for everyone to introduce themselves just like you have done

    My comments on Sohnidhurti are based on lack of knowing and/ or understanding the language. I speak Pushto, English, some Farsi and Urdu but Punjabi is like French to me. Just do not understand it in spite of trying.

    I will drop the topic of Baitullah Mehsud’ death at this time but I would like to reserve the right to resurrect it later if I feel like it based on what is said.

  • pak.nukes says:

    @shimatoree
    Why I wanted Taukeer,nota and Observer to intervene? Because I know they all care for Pakistan not punjai or pakhtoon or sindhi or mohajir or balouchi therefore I thought they might be able to put some sense into your head which is sounding so much like Altaf Hussain.

  • pak.nukes says:

    @Nota
    No I did not call him “altaf Hussain’ I said Shimatoree is sounding like him by talking things like Punjabi/Pathan, MQM type usual racial stuff…Have no idea abt the baboon allegation so I protest, protest, protest.
    Bhook hartal..Hunger strike.:):):)

  • afzaalkhan says:

    And it starts in USA,

    The Guns of August and Afghanistan

    At the very least, members of the House should be urged to sign on as cosponsors of H.R. 2404, which would “require the Secretary of Defense to submit a report to Congress outlining the United States exit strategy for United States military forces in Afghanistan participating in Operation Enduring Freedom.”

    So far, 95 members, including a number of Republicans, have signed on as co-sponsors of Massachusetts Congressman Jim McGovern’s proposal.

    But just calling for an exit strategy is not enough.

    Members of the House and Senate should he urged to support the rapid withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan.

    I’m for the first option: “American troops should be brought home from Afghanistan as soon as possible.”

    Yes, that’s a blunt choice, especially with regard to so complex a country and region — and especially after the United States has poured so much energy into the Afghanistan imbroglio.

    But it’s also the best choice.

    Pulling US troops out does not represent an abandonment of Afghanistan. Rather, it is a recognition that the current course has failed to achieve any of the goals outlined by the Bush-Cheney administration when the country was invaded or by the Obama-Biden administration when it recommitted to the mission.

    Despite what President Obama imagines, increasing the US troops’ presence in Afghanistan will simply make a misguided mission more misguided — not to mention more deadly and more expensive.

    Ultimately, the US may support a genuine multinational response – either through the United Nations or by a regional bloc — to threats posed either by the instability of Afghanistan or by groups operating in that country and neighboring Pakistan.

    But that response will only be appropriate and effective if US troops are withdrawn and the ridiculous North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) overlay on operations in that country has been ended.

  • Observer says:

    @ Afzaal, Pak.nukes and Shimatoree

    “….I am not Pakistani 1st am Muslim so for me there are no boundries and ethnicities or nation are nothing, one can be sindhi, baluchi pathan etc for themselves for me there is only one nation i.e Muslim.”

    Well said Afzaal, I second you about the above statement!

    I am myself a Punjabi, but like Afzaal I do not consider myself as Punjabi, Pakistani etc. first. Foremost I am a Muslim!

    Sohnidhurti: I haven’t considered the angle Shimatoree has mentioned. I don’t believe that it was Afzaal intention to promote a particular ethnicity.

    Btw: It is no secret that I do not like the site name for different reasons.

    - It does NOT reflect the type of discussion we normally have on this site i.e. politics. I would prefer to change the name.

    - The spelling is not correct :-(

    • mayoos-paki says:

      @observer
      Muslims? I am sorry I won’t call myself a Muslim first because if I do people ask me ‘are you shia? sunni and if Sunni, are you deobandi/barelvi/shaafi etc etc…so shia/sunni/punjabi/sindhi is all crap. My religion is my personal matter and my identity is my country not my race.

      • Observer says:

        @Maoyoos…

        It’s your choice. I agree that most people would ask whether you are a Sunni, shia etc. Personally I do not believe in that, and I do not let people decide what I shall answer unless they can provide a logical purpose. In this case I feel that the best answer is to stop after telling that I am Muslim. All the stuff after that has only helped to divide us further.

        If you choose to identify yourself as a Pakistani first, then it’s OK for me. You are responsible for your acts and no one should force you to change your belief.

        Btw: Being a Muslim has nothing to do with belonging to a certain race. On contrary Muslims are maybe most the most diversified people on the earth.

        • pak.nukes says:

          Being a Muslim has definitely got nothing to do with ethnic racism. This is exactly my point but put in a different way and perhaps different context.
          Non-Muslims living in Pakistan should be less patriotic than the Muslims of Pakistan, we should respect the Pakistani Hindus when they support the Indian cricket team playing against Pakistan. Right? After all they are Hindus first and then Pakistanis.:)

      • afzaalkhan says:

        ur confusing mazhab (religion) with deen (islam)

        2 different things u can be mazhaban sunni, shia, hanafi etc, but as deen u r only muslims. And if u are muslim then there is only one nation i.e islmaic ummah

        apni millat par qayas aqwam-e-maghrib se na kar
        khas hai tarkeeb main qaum-e-rasool-e-hashmi (SAW)

  • Observer says:

    @pak.nukes

    “we should respect the Pakistani Hindus when they support the Indian cricket team playing against Pakistan. Right?”

    Personally I wouldn’t mind that as long as they do not harm Pakistani interests. I also know that living as a minority in another country also causes some restraints according to the tolerance level. I am myself in a place where I constrain myself, and I mostly I understand why it should be like that.

    “After all they are Hindus first and then Pakistanis.:)”

    I don’t know how Hindus define their priority ethnicity/religion.

    I know that Muslims (at large) has provided the best possibilities to practice other religions. Remember Jews and other European minorities found refuge in f.ex. Muslim Spain, Marocco, Turkey etc.
    Muslims has a long history of tolerance. Unfortunately there are some violent/stupid outbursts in between which CANNOT be related to Islam!

  • pak.nukes says:

    @Afzaal
    Please thank you for your views but I do not allow anyone to interfere in what I think about my religion or deen whatever you want to call it because I for me I am answerable to Allah only. But I can certainly condemn those who are harming the country. If I am not a good Muslim, it doesn’t harm my coutry but if I don’t care for my country it would definitely harm my country in some way.
    @Observer
    Yes you are right but I don’t have to be Aamir Khan’ or Shahrukh Khan’s fan by default only because they are Muslims. For me Imran Khan is a priority because he is son of the soil but then we also have traitors like Musharaf and Altaf Hussain, I don’t respect them just becz they are Muslims and I hate them becz they are ghaddars of the soil.

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @pak.nukes

    Am sorry u can ignore my comments but like iqbal said

    mujhey hai hukm-e-azaan

    Its my duty as a muslim to point out where ppl r wrong, after that my duty is finished. To follow or not is then the person choice. But I have to do wat is my duty.

  • taukeer says:

    I don’t have a problem with the name even though I had suggested another name. And in fairness to Afzal http://www.sohnidhurti.com was what was available.

    I must very strongly object to ethnic origin discussion. I wonder what ethnic origin I will be assigned?

    @shimatoree I will like to learn Pushtoo as a beautiful language of people of my country of origin. So the ball is squarely in your court! And I must admit I love Pushtoo music the most of all the music of Pakistan.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AL2mow94waM

    and This is Unrivaled. Time to understand the strategy of the enemy.

  • taukeer says:

    Just so that we understand the designs of the enemy here is the detail of the template they want to replicate all over the Muslim World. For the sake of record I have reproduced the entire article.

    The Sheik Down

    By Shane Bauer

    August 12, 2009 “Mother Jones” — It’s a bright day in February, and I am in a pink villa on the outskirts of Fallujah, sitting with a tribal sheikh and a Marine commander as they hunch over a plate of truffles. The sheikh is Eifan Saddun al-Isawi, a charming 33-year-old Iraqi in a red-checkered kaffiyeh, a brown dishdasha, and DKNY wraparound sunglasses who uses phrases like “sons of bitches” when he talks about Al Qaeda with Americans. He is the head of Fallujah’s Sahwa, or Awakening, council, the Sunni militia hired by the United States in early 2007 to fight its enemies in Iraq, and he’s become one of the American military’s go-to guys in the city, as evidenced by the photos on his walls of him with George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

    The American officer, Lt. Colonel Chris Hastings, apologizes for forgetting to bring Eifan “magazines with pictures of pretty ladies” and congratulates him for winning a seat in the provincial elections. He proceeds to tell Eifan to make sure that a certain someone the Marines are “concerned” about doesn’t make it into local politics. Eifan assures him he’ll see to it.

    Hastings also needs Eifan on the hearts-and-minds front: The Marines recently killed a teacher strapped with a suicide belt, and Hastings wants the sheikh to convince his community that the Americans aren’t bloodthirsty warmongers. The Awakening councils don’t officially work for the Americans anymore—the Iraqi government now pays the $300-a-month salaries of Eifan’s men—but Eifan obliges immediately. “Give me pictures and I will give it to all the imams and sheikhs to show them he was wearing a belt,” he says. He then presses the lieutenant colonel to release some of his friends from prison (Hastings agrees), offers him an antique hunting rifle (Hastings declines), and steers the talk back to the topic he’s been hinting at throughout the meeting: American cash.

    “Just tell the colonel to give me the contract. Come on, man. You know I’ll do a good job,” he says. Over the years, Eifan’s gotten used to the way Americans do business in Iraq. Working with them has made him a millionaire.

    Hastings isn’t particularly proud of that fact. He has been trying to wean the sheikh off the no-bid contracts the Pentagon has been giving him and his relatives for the past few years. The military has put “a lot of money” into Sheikh Eifan, he explains, and “he’s gotten a little bit greedy.”

    Eifan is a beneficiary of what some American personnel call the “make-a-sheikh” program, a semiofficial, little discussed policy that since late 2006 has bankrolled Sunni sheikhs who are, in theory, committed to defending American interests in Iraq. The program was a major part of the Awakening, which the Pentagon has touted as a turning point in reducing violence and creating the conditions for an American withdrawal. It was also a reinstitution of a strategy started by Saddam Hussein, who picked out tribal leaders he could manipulate through patronage schemes. The US military didn’t give the sheikhs straight-up bribes, which would have raised eyebrows in Washington. Instead, it handed out reconstruction contracts. Sometimes issued at three or four times market value, the contracts have been the grease in the wheels of the Awakening in Anbar—the almost entirely Sunni province in western Iraq where Fallujah is located.

    The US military has never admitted to arming militias in Iraq—or giving anything more than $350 a month to Anbari tribesmen to fight alongside Americans against Sunni resistance groups and Al Qaeda. But reconstruction payments, sometimes handed out in shrink-wrapped bundles of $100 bills, have left plenty of extra for the sheikhs to “help themselves as far as security goes,” as one Marine officer describes it, or “buy guns,” as Eifan’s uncle, Sheikh Talib Hasnawi, puts it.

    From the Pentagon’s perspective, the money gave Iraqis a reason to support—or at least stop attacking—the United States in the province where more American soldiers had been killed than in any other. But it has also put security in western Iraq in the hands of powerful, heavily armed men whose cooperation is based not on loyalty to Baghdad or Washington but on a consistent flow of cash.

    When Eifan registered his construction firm, Al-Thuraya Contracting Co., with the Iraqi government in 2003, it barely had $4,000 in capital. Today, though, business is booming. “I’m going to turn Anbar into Dubai,” he boasts.

    Dubai isn’t quite what comes to mind as I watch four men mixing cement and stacking cinder blocks, setting the foundation for a clinic a couple of miles from his compound. The 3,000-square-foot building is the most recent of Eifan’s several “patronage projects,” as Hastings describes them. The military paid the sheikh $488,000 for it, yet Hastings estimates that it will cost around $100,000 to build. “That’s, you know, a pretty good profit margin,” he says—close to 80 percent. In comparison, KBR, the largest military contractor in the country, cleared 3 percent in profits in 2008. Halliburton scored around 14 percent.

    Most of these kinds of projects are funded through the Commander’s Emergency Response Program, which allows batallion commanders to hand out reconstruction contracts worth up to $500,000 without approval from their superiors or Washington. CERP was founded in 2003 by then-Coalition Provisional Authority head Paul Bremer, who took its initial funding from a pool of seized Iraqi assets. Over the next five years, the program disbursed more than $3.5 billion in American taxpayer dollars. A Pentagon manual called “Money as a Weapon System” broadly defines CERP’s purpose as providing “urgent humanitarian relief and reconstruction.” The guideline has been interpreted liberally: CERP recently funded the development of a $33 million Baghdad International Airport “Economic Zone” with two hotels, a remodeled VIP wing, and a $900,000 mural depicting an “economic theme.”

    CERP regulations explicitly prohibit the use of cash for giving goods, services, or funds to armed groups, including “civil defense forces” and “infrastructure protection forces”—Pentagonspeak for militias. But Sam Parker, an Iraq programs officer at the United States Institute of Peace, says it’s “no real secret” among the military in Iraq that CERP contracts are inflated to pay off sheikhs and their armies. Austin Long, an analyst with the Rand Corporation who has been studying the Awakening, says it is not unusual for contracts to go to sheikhs who, like Eifan, had little or no construction experience before the 2003 invasion. “Contracts are inflated because they are only secondarily about the goods and services received,” explains Parker. “It’s very problematic. You are rewarding the guys with the guns.”

    Five years and hundreds of millions of reconstruction dollars later, Fallujah remains a shell. The “city of mosques” still has minarets with gaping holes left by American rockets during the 2004 siege. Men wander the streets; the World Food Programme says 36 percent of Fallujans have no chance of employment. The city gets no more than eight hours of electricity a day. Sewage fills the streets; a sewer project is four years behind schedule and has cost $98 million, more than three times its original budget. Building after building is nothing but broken-down cement frames. Some have been repurposed by the Iraqi army as watchtowers, others by women drying their laundry. Bullet holes pockmark everything.

    I walk down the city’s main thoroughfare guided by a police officer. As I chat with a man about the collapsed building beside his shop, my notebook out, a group of men approach, eager to air their grievances. “When any country in the world gets money for reconstruction, it shows. But not here,” says a burly man who calls himself Nabil. “The contractors just slap something together and put the money in their pockets,” he says, slipping invisible bills into an imaginary shirt pocket. “Reconstruction contracts are deals between the Americans and their collaborators. I don’t want to name names, but people who didn’t have cigarettes in their pockets now have piles of money and brand-new, bulletproof cars.”

    Later, Eifan smirks as he tells me his black armored BMW is 1 of 11 in the entire world. Unlike the white Land Cruiser the Americans gave him last year (in 2008, the military spent $1.54 million on vehicles for “Anbari leaders”), he swears the sedan—which he claims is worth $420,000—was not a gift. “It will resist any automatic weapon and it will hold up pretty well in a bombing,” he tells me, smacking one of its two-inch-thick windows. I grab an energy drink from the leather-covered, refrigerated liquor cabinet in the backseat as we admire its hidden cameras and a security feature that lets Eifan speak to people outside the car without rolling down the windows.

    A few years ago, hardly anyone outside a green stretch of date orchards and wheat fields a few miles south of Fallujah knew who Eifan was. Born in Iraq but raised in Saudi Arabia, he didn’t know much about his homeland except that his father was poisoned by the Baath Party’s secret services in Egypt five years after he’d tried to lead an uprising in 1976. Eifan moved back to Iraq in 2001 with a degree in accounting, married, had three kids, and started a small construction company.

    He says the American invasion “was a big mistake,” but coming from a family of shrewd businessmen, he knew an opportunity when he saw one. “I’ll do business with anyone. I don’t care who it is,” he says. He built a small militia “for protection” and, according to a close associate, started running construction materials to American bases. He says he tried to convince the Americans not to lay siege to Fallujah. Eifan considers the thousands of Iraqis subsequently killed heroes.

    Today, being in Fallujah as a guest of Sheikh Eifan is like seeing Baghdad from the Green Zone. His home is a small fortress, surrounded by 12-foot walls, with a shack of armed men guarding the entrance. Suicide bombers have killed several of his militiamen at the front gate; many others have lost their lives in the 12 assassination attempts Eifan claims he has survived. Next to a 10-foot-tall picture of the sheikh in a paisley dishdasha, two pickups mounted with machine guns are constantly ready to go. They follow him almost everywhere.

    While Eifan slips away for meetings on American bases or appointments with politicians, he leaves me with his armed assistants, who brusquely dissuade me from asking too many questions, including about their boss’ whereabouts. While he is gone, people trickle in and gather in his diwan, or sit in lawn chairs around his empty swimming pool. Some days, upwards of 20 men await his return. Sometimes they watch TV or play with a remote-controlled helicopter, but mostly they sit in silence over dark, sweet tea.

    When Eifan returns, the men hop to their feet and form concentric circles around him in hopes of stealing his attention. Sometimes, he hands out envelopes of cash. Other times, he ignores everyone and does side wheelies on his ATV around the compound. When I met Eifan for the first time, he was coming back from a meeting with the prime minister. He ordered his men to start up the grill so he could cook the crab one of his American friends had just brought him from Florida.

    Before we pull out of a gas station along the Baghdad-Amman highway, Eifan peels several crisp 25,000 dinar notes (roughly the equivalent of $20 bills) off a fat wad he keeps in his pocket and hands them to a police officer through his barely rolled-down window. “Go buy yourself a Pepsi,” he tells him. The two trucks filled with Eifan’s armed men position themselves in front of and behind the BMW.

    Eifan plays the Sahwa’s orchestral anthem on the stereo and looks at me in the rearview mirror. “I did not cooperate with the Americans to ruin Iraq,” he says. “I cooperated with the Americans because they were a reality enforced on Iraq.” He blames the United States for giving rise to the extreme violence that tore Iraq apart, but personally takes credit for making this route safe. “It used to be impossible to drive on this road,” he says. He points to an overpass where he says Al Qaeda hung two people. We float past crumpled cars, remains of the suicide bombings that once targeted outsiders who ventured into Anbar.

    I don’t have to worry about being pulled out of the car by masked gunmen, in part because the attacks stopped when the hijackers realized the Americans paid better. The original leader of the provincial Sahwa, and a close friend of Eifan’s, Sheikh Abdul Sattar Abu Risha, was well known for running a successful ring of highway bandits. Initially, he had tried to befriend Al Qaeda, but then Al Qaeda began raiding Anbar’s roads to raise funds, and a turf war ensued.

    And so Abu Risha’s alliance with the Americans began. Eifan and several other Anbari sheikhs fled to Jordan in 2005, but a group of Marines convinced them to return at the end of 2006. It’s not clear what promises were made, but when the sheikhs came home, they and other Sunni tribal leaders began fighting the insurgents alongside the Americans. Eifan initially refused to join Abu Risha’s Sahwa—Abu Risha belonged to a different tribe—but once the Americans started giving Abu Risha contracts, Eifan changed his mind.

    Getting a full accounting of the make-a-sheikh program is nearly impossible; at press time the Pentagon was still responding to multiple Freedom of Information Act requests. Yet data from Pentagon reports to Congress indicate that in Fallujah, CERP funds more than tripled in the year starting in September 2006. Anbar has received $424 million in CERP funds, more per capita than any other province ($297 per person, twice as much as Baghdad). Abu Risha, once one of Anbar’s most notorious criminals, hosted the first “reconstruction fair,” in Ramadi. He was assassinated in September 2007, just days after meeting with George W. Bush.

    The main point of the CERP contracts “was to try to get people to realize that if they played by the rules we were establishing, then they would have a chance to actually play the game,” explains Commander Edward Robison, who worked as a Navy reconstruction officer in Anbar in 2007. And “play the game,” he clarifies, means “make money.” As he tells it, the US military or Iraqi politicians would handpick a pliable sheikh, then award him funds that he could hand out as he saw fit. “If you were an individual who was not going to be one of the players in the community, you did not get work. The ones who were going to be players, they got work.”

    Funneling billions of dollars into an unstable country “has raised the stakes of corruption considerably,” says the US Institute of Peace’s Parker. According to Transparency International, Iraq is tied with Burma as the world’s second most corrupt country, behind Somalia. Payoffs and profiteering are widely seen as “the cost of doing business” in Iraq, Parker says. He believes the US government doesn’t care whether Iraqis are left with a corrupt country when our troops leave. “We are fine with letting the Iraqis have their own corrupt system for themselves.”

    Maki al-Nazzal, a former UN field worker who grew up in Anbar and knows Eifan’s family, notes that even American troops have not been immune to the temptations of graft. “Officers want their cut,” he says. “It used to be 15 percent of the contract.” In March, investigations by the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR) led to the arrest of several commanders taking kickbacks. Three South Korean Coalition soldiers were convicted for stealing $2.9 million in CERP funds in a bribery scheme, and a US Army captain was indicted for stealing $690,000 in CERP funds after a late-model BMW and a Hummer showed up in his driveway back in Oregon.

    SIGIR is currently investigating around 80 cases of corruption and waste. But it has turned a blind eye to CERP’s function as a payoff dispenser for the military. Inspector General Stuart Bowen may have bigger fish to fry—by his own accounting, at least $8.8 billion in reconstruction funds went missing between just October 2003 and June 2004. (Oversight of the reconstruction of Afghanistan has also been spotty at best; see “No Accounting for Waste.”)

    Oversight for CERP projects of less than $500,000 is almost nonexistent, according to the Government Accountability Office. Yet in its audit of CERP in 2008, the GAO decided against digging any deeper. “We did not really look at any of the contracting practices or how they were awarded or that kind of thing,” says Sharon Pickup, the GAO’s director of defense capabilities and management. SIGIR representatives declined to be interviewed for this story, as did the spokesperson for the Department of Defense inspector general.

    Eifan at ease (above). A “lower level” guest of the sheikh (right).

    Meanwhile, Congress continues to approve CERP funds for Iraq—approximately $1 billion is in the works for next year—under the assumption that the program’s sole purpose is humanitarian relief and reconstruction. Most members of Congress remain unaware that the American alliance with the Sunni tribes has gone beyond the now defunct security contracts that paid their fighters’ salaries. “There’s not been a lot of discussion about [CERP],” says Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.). “The program has largely given the commanders in the field the ability to use funds with what appears to me to be very little accountability.”

    Back in Eifan’s diwan, I am sipping tea with a roomful of men when the sheikh bursts in, sweeping a long stick across the room. “Nobody say a word!” he shouts. Four heavies march in behind him and throw a man on the floor, his feet, hands, and eyes tightly bound with kaffiyehs. A man in green camo with an AK-47 blocks the doorway.

    The captive’s chest heaves as Eifan stands over him, stick in hand. An hour earlier, the sheikh was shouting into his cell phone about a botched reconstruction contract. Eifan stands to lose $50,000, and the compound has filled with murmurs about when and how he’ll explode. The crime of the man curled up on the floor isn’t related; in fact, no one is sure he’s committed a crime at all, but some goatherds have accused him of being involved in a kidnapping. Eifan fires questions at him while the room holds its collective breath. “Don’t stop to think of lies!” Whack! The stick comes down against his thigh.

    Fallujah’s police chief shows up, clearly deferent to Eifan’s authority. Finally, satisfied with the interrogation, Eifan orders his men to bring tea to the shaken detainee. “We have many levels of guests here,” he says, looking over at me. “This one is on a lower level.” The police carry the man away. I ask Eifan what will happen to him. “They will interrogate him in a different way,” he says flatly.

    After everyone leaves, he takes me into another room, turns on a Lebanese beauty pageant, and pours some whiskey. He says his form of tribal justice is the only effective kind. “We still can’t trust the police. That’s why people come to me,” he says. Despite winning the seat on the provincial council and his occasional meetings with the prime minister and other top politicians, Eifan shows little faith in the government. He confesses that his reason for making common cause with the Americans wasn’t only to fight Al Qaeda; he also wanted to gain power over the Shiites, whom he sometimes spitefully calls Iranians, who control the government in Baghdad. “They wanted to desecrate Sunni land, repress Sunnis, and kill Sunnis. I was certain that we would not be able to get out of this problem unless we put our hand in the hand of the Americans.”

    That was two years ago, and since then reconstruction money has bought a lot of guns—guns the Awakening councils now aren’t shy to threaten to use against fellow Iraqis. The councils’ last beef was with the Iraqi Islamic Party, their main rival in the January provincial elections. For months leading up to them, assassinations had been taking out leaders on both sides. The current Sahwa leader in Anbar, Ahmed Abu Risha (brother of the slain Abdul Sattar Abu Risha), threatened to make Anbar “like Darfur” if the IIP won the vote. It was a flashback to the sheikhs’ original conflict with Al Qaeda: a fight for control over the spoils of war. The new battle, according to a report by the International Crisis Group, “centered on the control over resources, notably reconstruction contracts.”

    Peter Harling, senior Middle East analyst with the ICG, says the volatility in Anbar indicates why buying allies, as appealing as it may seem, is unfavorable to a stable, democratic future in Iraq. “The pillaging of state resources is not a particularly good strategy,” he says. “It creates a culture of predators and a lot of resentment from those who don’t take part in those contracts. You might lavish one tribal leader with contracts but alienate 10 others.” Rand analyst Long is also concerned that the strategy is shortsighted and could lead to unpredictable shifts in political loyalties when the United States cuts off the funding. “The question is, are the people we picked to be our friends going to continue to be supported by the Iraqi government?” he says. “If the people we were paying off don’t get that kind of support, what does that do to stability? I think it’s a real risk.”

    For now, the Iraqi government seems set on keeping a lid on Anbar by sticking to the American policy of buying off the sheikhs with contracts. When Eifan and I drive to Baghdad, we stop on a bridge overlooking a small river and a dam. The dam’s overseer approaches the car and explains to Eifan that the provincial council told him they couldn’t afford to fix it.

    “How much did you tell them it would cost?” Eifan asks. The man hands him a slip of paper. “I’ll get the prime minister to sign off on this and I’ll do the work myself,” Eifan says. “But first, write a new proposal. And double the price.”

  • taukeer says:

    Just an update on this story:

    “So in my opinion,” General Gul continued, “there was some kind of a deal which was about to be arrived at — they may have already cut a deal. I don’t know. I don’t have enough information on that. But this is my hunch, that Baitullah was killed because now he was trying to reach an agreement with the Pakistan army. And that’s why there were no suicide attacks inside Pakistan for the past six or seven months.”

    http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article23375.htm

  • afzaalkhan says:

    @taukeer

    come on mate Since Gen sahib dun know how abt this scenario? he has just kidnapped cadets b4 he got killed. He wasn’t abt to strike a deal, wat he was to do was blackmail military. OR

    He was killed by Americans cuz Pak military was close to get him themselves and fear was if he get caught alive the information he can spill ;)

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

*

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.